Publicación:
Descripción de pacientes con sepsis urinaria emergencias hospital universitario Bogotá 2018–2019.

dc.contributor.authorTamayo Perez , Estefany Lorenaspa
dc.contributor.authorLaguado Castro , Vivian Marcelaspa
dc.contributor.authorMartínez Rojas , Edwin Fernandospa
dc.contributor.authorQuevedo Mayorga , Pedro Arbeyspa
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-11T01:07:45Z
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-05T14:25:23Z
dc.date.available2024-01-11T01:07:45Z
dc.date.available2025-08-05T14:25:23Z
dc.date.issued2024-01-11
dc.description.abstractIntroducción: El 30% de los casos de sepsis son de origen urinario, del 25-35% progresan a choque séptico   con mayor velocidad respecto a otros focos infecciosos, 4.7 (±) 2.4 vs 7.2 (±) 4.5 horas, su mortalidad a los 30 días desde la atención en urgencias es del 10%, pero en casos más severos del 25- 50%. Objetivos: Describir la población con sepsis urinaria atendidos en emergencias del hospital universitario clínica San Rafael (Bogotá D.C.) desde diciembre de 2018 hasta diciembre de 2019. Materiales y Métodos: Se realizó un estudio retrospectivo de corte transversal durante 12 meses, se aplicó muestreo probabilístico aleatorio para 70 pacientes, se realizó el análisis univariado con frecuencias absolutas y relativas y los multivariados con regresión logística. Resultados: El 60% de los pacientes con urosepsis fueron mujeres, el 77,1% tenían diabetes tipo 2, se obtuvieron resultados positivos en hemocultivos y urocultivos en un 34.2% y 84.2% respectivamente. El 21.4% progresaron a choque séptico. La mediana de Sofa score fue 3.0.  Se demostró asociación significativa de desenlaces fatales con: Sexo masculino (14.2% vs 7.1% OR 4.0 IC95% 1.06-17.3 p= 0.03), alteración de la conciencia (11.4 vs 7.1% OR: 10.8 IC95% 2.38-56.2 p<0.01), choque séptico (12.8% vs 8.5% OR: 11.5 IC95% 2.67-57.4 p<0.01) y edad mayor de 79.5 años (AUC 0.67 IC95% 0.51-0.83). Conclusión: La sepsis urinaria en nuestra población fue más prevalente en mujeres, adultos mayores y en diabéticos, el 21.4% progresaron a choque séptico, se demostró asociación significativa con la mortalidad en hombres, en mayores de 79 años y en pacientes con alteración de la conciencia.spa
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: 30% of sepsis cases are of urinary origin, 25-35% progress to septic shock faster than other infectious foci, 4.7 (±) 2.4 vs 7.2 (±) 4.5 hours, their mortality at 30 days from emergency care is 10%, but in more severe cases 25-50%. Objective: Describe the population with urinary sepsis treated in the emergency department of the San Rafael Clinic University Hospital (Bogotá D.C.) from December 2018 to December 2019. Materials and methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study was carried out for 12 months, random probabilistic sampling was applied to 70 patients, univariate analysis was performed with absolute and relative frequencies and multivariate with logistic regression. Results: 60% of the patients with urosepsis were women, 77.1% had type 2 diabetes, positive results were obtained in blood and urine cultures of 34.2% and 84.2% respectively. 21.4% progressed to septic shock. The median Sofa score was 3.0. A significant association of fatal outcomes was demonstrated with: Male sex (14.2% vs 7.1% OR: 4.0 IC95% 1.06-17.3 p= 0.03), altered consciousness (11.4 vs 7.1% OR: 10.8 IC95% 2.38-56.2 p<0.01) , septic shock (12.8% vs 8.5% OR: 11.5 95%CI 2.67-57.4 p<0.01) and age greater than 79.5 years (AUC 0.67 95%CI 0.51-0.83). Conclusions: Urinary sepsis in our population was more prevalent in women, older adults and diabetics, 21.4% progressed to septic shock, a significant association with mortality was demonstrated in men, in those over 79 years of age and in patients with impaired consciousness.eng
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.identifier.doi10.26752/cuarzo.v29.n2.530
dc.identifier.eissn2500-7181
dc.identifier.issn0121-2133
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.juanncorpas.edu.co/handle/001/429
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.26752/cuarzo.v29.n2.530
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherFundación Universitaria Juan N. Corpasspa
dc.relation.bitstreamhttps://revistas.juanncorpas.edu.co/index.php/cuarzo/article/download/530/528
dc.relation.citationendpage33
dc.relation.citationissue2spa
dc.relation.citationstartpage27
dc.relation.citationvolume29spa
dc.relation.ispartofjournalRevista Cuarzospa
dc.relation.referencesBonkat G, Cai T, Veeratterapillay R, Bruyère F, Bartoletti R, Pilatz A, et al. Management of Urosepsis in 2018. Eur Urol Focus. enero de 2019;5(1):5-9.spa
dc.relation.referencesRhodes A, Evans LE, Alhazzani W, Levy MM, Antonelli M, Ferrer R, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016. Intensive Care Med. 1 de marzo de 2017;43(3):304-77.spa
dc.relation.referencesJulián-Jiménez A, Supino M, López Tapia JD, Ulloa González C, Vargas Téllez LE, González Del Castillo J, et al. Sepsis in the emergency department: key points, controversies, and proposals for improvements in Latin America. Emergencias. abril de 2019;31(2):123-35.spa
dc.relation.referencesCaterino JM, Leininger R, Kline DM, Southerland LT, Khaliqdina S, Baugh CW, et al. Accuracy of Current Diagnostic Criteria for Acute Bacterial Infection in Older Adults in the Emergency Department. J Am Geriatr Soc. agosto de 2017;65(8):1802-9.spa
dc.relation.referencesShallcross LJ, Rockenschaub P, McNulty D, Freemantle N, Hayward A, Gill MJ. Diagnostic uncertainty and urinary tract infection in the emergency department: a cohort study from a UK hospital. BMC Emerg Med. 19 de mayo de 2020;20(1):40.spa
dc.relation.referencesCaraballo C, Ascuntar J, Hincapié C, Restrepo C, Bernal E, Jaimes F. Association between site of infection and in-hospital mortality in patients with sepsis admitted to emergency departments of tertiary hospitals in Medellin, Colombia. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. marzo de 2019;31(1):47-56.spa
dc.relation.referencesNicolle LE. Asymptomatic bacteriuria in the elderly. Infect Dis Clin North Am. septiembre de 1997;11(3):647-62.spa
dc.relation.referencesQiang XH, Yu TO, Li YN, Zhou LX. Prognosis Risk of Urosepsis in Critical Care Medicine: A Prospective Observational Study. Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:9028924.spa
dc.relation.referencesHtwe TH, Mushtaq A, Robinson SB, Rosher RB, Khardori N. Infection in the elderly. Infect Dis Clin North Am. septiembre de 2007;21(3):711-43, ix.spa
dc.relation.referencesBlot S, Cankurtaran M, Petrovic M, Vandijck D, Lizy C, Decruyenaere J, et al. Epidemiology and outcome of nosocomial bloodstream infection in elderly critically ill patients: a comparison between middle-aged, old, and very old patients. Crit Care Med. mayo de 2009;37(5):1634-41.spa
dc.relation.referencesHernández C, Fehér C, Soriano A, Marco F, Almela M, Cobos-Trigueros N, et al. Clinical characteristics and outcome of elderly patients with community-onset bacteremia. J Infect. febrero de 2015;70(2):135-43.spa
dc.relation.referencesAngioni D, Hites M, Jacobs F, De Breucker S. Predictive Factors of In-Hospital Mortality in Older Adults with Community-Acquired Bloodstream Infection. J Frailty Aging. 2020;9(4):232-7.spa
dc.relation.referencesKitagawa K, Shigemura K, Yamamichi F, Osawa K, Uda A, Koike C, et al. Bacteremia complicating urinary tract infection by Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Mortality risk factors. Int J Urol. marzo de 2019;26(3):358-62.spa
dc.relation.referencesGharbi M, Drysdale JH, Lishman H, Goudie R, Molokhia M, Johnson AP, et al. Antibiotic management of urinary tract infection in elderly patients in primary care and its association with bloodstream infections and all cause mortality: population based cohort study. BMJ [Internet]. 27 de febrero de 2019 [citado 29 de septiembre de 2022];364.spa
dc.relation.referencesSubramanian A, Bhat S, Mookkappan S, Anitha P, Kandasamy R, Kanungo R. Empiric antibiotic and in-vitro susceptibility of urosepsis pathogens: do they match? The outcome of a study from south India. J Infect Dev Ctries. 30 de septiembre de 2021;15(9):1346-50.spa
dc.relation.referencesRosser CJ, Bare RL, Meredith JW. Urinary tract infections in the critically ill patient with a urinary catheter. Am J Surg. abril de 1999;177(4):287-90.spa
dc.relation.referencesJiang L, Lin SH, Wang J, Chu CK. Prognostic values of procalcitonin and platelet in the patient with urosepsis. Medicine (Baltimore). 9 de julio de 2021;100(27):e26555.spa
dc.relation.referencesSheng Y, Zheng WL, Shi QF, Zhang BY, Yang GY. Clinical characteristics and prognosis in patients with urosepsis from intensive care unit in Shanghai, China: a retrospective bi-centre study. BMC Anesthesiol. 27 de noviembre de 2021;21(1):296.spa
dc.relation.referencesSkogberg K, Lyytikäinen O, Ollgren J, Nuorti JP, Ruutu P. Population-based burden of bloodstream infections in Finland. Clin Microbiol Infect. junio de 2012;18(6):E170-176.spa
dc.relation.referencesHolmbom M, Andersson M, Grabe M, Peeker R, Saudi A, Styrke J, et al. Community-onset urosepsis: incidence and risk factors for 30-day mortality – a retrospective cohort study. Scandinavian Journal of Urology. 20 de septiembre de 2022;0(0):1-7.spa
dc.relation.referencesChung HY, Wickel J, Brunkhorst FM, Geis C. Sepsis-Associated Encephalopathy: From Delirium to Dementia? Journal of Clinical Medicine. marzo de 2020;9(3):703.spa
dc.relation.referencesGofton TE, Young GB. Sepsis-associated encephalopathy. Nat Rev Neurol. octubre de 2012;8(10):557-66.spa
dc.relation.referencesEidelman LA, Putterman D, Putterman C, Sprung CL. The spectrum of septic encephalopathy. Definitions, etiologies, and mortalities. JAMA. 14 de febrero de 1996;275(6):470-3..spa
dc.rightsEstefany Lorena Tamayo Perez , Vivian Marcela Laguado Castro , Edwin Fernando Martínez Rojas , Pedro Arbey Quevedo Mayorga - 2023spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa
dc.rights.creativecommonsEsta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.spa
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0spa
dc.sourcehttps://revistas.juanncorpas.edu.co/index.php/cuarzo/article/view/530spa
dc.subjectSepsiseng
dc.subjectUrinary Tracteng
dc.subjectEmergencieseng
dc.subjectDescriptioneng
dc.subjectPopulationeng
dc.subjectSepsisspa
dc.subjectTracto Urinariospa
dc.subjectEmergenciasspa
dc.subjectDescripciónspa
dc.subjectPoblaciónspa
dc.titleDescripción de pacientes con sepsis urinaria emergencias hospital universitario Bogotá 2018–2019.spa
dc.title.translatedDescription of patients with urinary sepsis in emergencies at university hospital Bogotá 2018- 2019.eng
dc.typeArtículo de revistaspa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501spa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85spa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlespa
dc.type.localJournal articleeng
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREFspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionspa
dspace.entity.typePublicationspa

Archivos